Home Blog Page 81

ARCTIC CAT’S 2020 RIOT and RIOT X

0

SnowTrax TV’s Luke Lester Reports On The Pros And Cons Of A New-Generation Cat Crossover…

The 2020 RIOT is probably Arctic Cat’s most-changed platform this year. For a moment, erase your previous impressions of its direct competitors, the Polaris Switchback 144 and Ski-Doo Backcountry 146 and tell us what you think of it as an off-trail Crossover on its own. What are its strengths or weaknesses in comparison to the others?

Luke: I’ve spent a good amount of time on the 2020 RIOT and RIOT X both on and off the trail and if I had to pick one word to describe my feelings about them, it would be “impressed”. I had pretty low expectations for this sled before I swung my leg over the seat for the first time, but it didn’t seem to matter where I went riding it, this sled exceeded my expectations. On the trail, it’s a great trail sled. Off trail, it’s a great off-trail sled.

I would compare it very closely to the Switchback 144 in that it really does do a great job at both ends of the spectrum. The Ski-Doo is more biased to off-trail with the hybrid front end. But, like the Switchback 144, the RIOT comes extremely close to that perfect 50/50 mix.

Is the power-revised 2020 SDI 800 really noticeable or is it just hype to keep Cat customers happy? When riding it, how and when does the power change evidence itself?

Luke: It would be unfair to comment fully on the new 800, simply because my experience with it was at altitude. But, I can say there was nothing about the new engine that jumped out at me in terms of major improvement. With that said, this is a stellar powerplant and was a great engine last year, too. It revs fast, pulls hard and it likes to wail up top. As an 800, I have nothing bad to say about it.

Cat went big with a completely new skidframe design for the RIOT, called Cross-Action. The new setup uses torsion springs and torque sensing links like a trail sled but is uncoupled. What are the design benefits it offers over the former coil-over skid and how does the change benefit the sled in a) deep powder situations and b) trail riding situations?

Luke: This skid is really the secret to why the RIOT is such a great Crossover. Moving to a more traditional trail skid results in more than acceptable on-trail riding characteristics. It handles bumps of all sizes well, just like a trail sled should. Being uncoupled does allow the sled to lift its skis a bit more than might be ultimately desirable on the trail, but this is one of the only trade-offs that were necessary to give this sled its impressive off-trail capabilities. And it is impressive off-trail. Like the Switchback 144, you can keep up with mountain sleds in situations that would leave most other crossovers buried.

Cat offers its full-on AMS (Arctic Cat Mountain Sled) front end parts and geometry on the RIOT X. Does this obvious off-trail focus compromise the sled’s handling capabilities as a true Crossover sled? ARS II, Cat’s newest front end, is used on the plain vanilla RIOT. How do they behave differently?

Luke: In my opinion, this was a genius move by Arctic Cat. Make the standard RIOT as close to a 50/50 Crossover as possible. Then offer the X model as a much more off-trail biased unit. And this is exactly what they are. The X definitely doesn’t handle as well on the trail though it does still ride good. But there’s no question, the secret to the Riot’s 50/50 personality is the trail front end… just like the Switchback 144.

Did Arctic Cat nail the track length and lug depth with the RIOT? Would you change anything back there?

Luke: I think Cat did a great job on the RIOT with its 146-inch track with 2-inch lugs. The lug height is about as tall as you’d want to go on a sled you intend to ride on the trail 50-percent of the time. But the 146-inch length is what makes it so capable off-trail for the other 50-percent of your day. Again, this is why offering both the RIOT and RIOT X was genius. The X model gets the deeper 2-inch lug track that, on the trail, is overkill but positively affects how the sled handles deeper snow conditions.

You’ve mentioned formerly that, ergonomically, some Cats don’t feel as good to you as you’d personally like. Describe the feedback you get from the RIOT.

Luke: The RIOT is an interesting sled from an ergonomic perspective. I don’t love the low seating position on Arctic Cat trail sleds. The RIOT uses the mountain seat which is taller, and in my opinion, better, even on the trail. However, the seat is pretty short, so you’re forced to ride up closer to the tank. Still, I like the RIOT’s ergonomics better than the trail sleds.

What would you change about the RIOT? What would you keep?

Luke: I don’t think there’s much I’d change. Like the Switchback, this sled is great both on and off trail. Trying to improve it for one would only hurt the other. I think one thing that could improve the sled on-trail with no negative consequences off-trail would be tipped rails, though. This would make the sled feel more nimble and maneuverable on the trail without hurting traction at all off-trail.

Give us a 1-10 rating of the RIOT as a trail sled. Now, do the same with it as an off-trail sled and tell us why?

Luke: Judged entirely on how it performs on-trail, the RIOT gets an 8 out of 10 from me. BTW, that’s exactly how I’d score any Arctic Cat 8000 series trail sled. Judged solely how it performs off-trial, but still considering its Crossover classification, I’d give it an 8 out of 10 there, too. The trail front end is not as capable off-trail, but the stand up ergonomics and longer-than-average track make up for a lot of that.

2020 YAMAHA SIDEWINDER XTX LE

0

Lightness is rule numero uno when you’re building a powder sled. Sure there’s near unlimited power with the SideWinder but deep-snow handling is always compromised with the heavier power package.

This is the first thing 4-stroke haters will bring up when you attempt to slot a SideWinder into the crossover segment.

However, you can’t deny it; power makes up for a lot of extra mass in the equation – as long as you’ve dialed in the traction and handling packages.

Yes, it takes a skillful rider to master the combo of massive power and extra weight off-trail – but when you pull it off, the results are impressive!

Weight, or maybe better described, flotation, is a prime reason Yamaha has upgraded its long-suffering X-TX from a 141-inch track to a 146 for 2020.

Furthermore, early-season marketing has provided two distinct versions of the X-TX – both of which are completely different from one another.

The early-order-only LE is actually closer to what we would call a true crossover sled than the in-season SE.

The LE offers Yamaha’s new, co-designed-with-Arctic Cat, ARCS (Advanced Roll Center Suspension) up front in combination with a new Versatrack skidframe with a higher front shock mount and a set of QS3 shocks.

The skid has a 1.6-inch deep Cobra wrapped around it – and we think this is a near-perfect blend for trail and off-trail riding – even if the SE does offer a deeper (2.0) track.

The Versatrack skidframe uses conventional design, incorporating two shocks (one front, one rear), torsion springs on the rear arm rather than coilovers, and torque sensing links left and right – but no coupling.

The front end was actually designed with flatland powder and trail use in mind – not so much pure vertical climbing. The spindles are skinny-efficient in deep snow and the higher roll center geometry makes far better use of Yamaha’s Tuner skis on trails and the wider, 6.5-inch Crossover versions on the LE.

The handling improvement cancels Yamaha’s ski deficiencies and turns the sled into a very competitive handler. We cannot describe the difference this makes in riding confidence when you consider how much power is gnawing at your right thumb all the time.

Out back, the uncoupled Versatrack transfers hard and the torque links drive the skid deep down into the powder as long as your thumb is applying throttle.

This is vital to fast climb-out when you’re in powder taking off from a dead stop or about to have an oh-no moment when the only solution is to feed in massive throttle and hang on.

Is 1.6-inches enough track depth to bail you out? We think it is in most cases, but the real benefits are: Less friction from a slightly shallower track and more versatility for groomed trail riding.

This brings up an important consideration: Do off-trail-prone riders buy a SideWinder to 100-percent compete with off-trail 2-strokes?

Honestly, we don’t think so. The weight thing is just too hard to argue against. We think the SideWinder crossover rider rides about 80-percent trail, 20-percent off-trail – at the most, probably 70-30.

If you accept this reality, the X-TX LE is ideally targeted and if you cashed up for one on the spring-buy program, you won’t be sorry.

2020 POLARIS INDY XC 137

0

SnowTrax TV’s AJ Lester Shares His Opinions on the 137-inch Indy…

AJ, you rode the 129-inch version of the new Indy XC quite a bit last winter. Give us some initial impressions of that sled, say, in comparison to the Pro-Ride RUSH or Switchback at the beginning of the season. How did it hit you when you first rode it?

AJ: I was impressed with the 129’s instant comfort and ride-ability without the need to set the suspension up perfectly for your weight. This was and had become a requirement for the Pro-Ride external shock suspension. The XC is good to go for a wide variety of riders’ weights and will also smooth out small, medium and large trail bumps without needing to go underneath and adjust clickers or spring preload.

At that time, did your strong impressions of the then-new 850 twin overpower your impressions of the new Indy platform?

AJ: I’d have to say the engine and chassis were both home runs, but yeah, I couldn’t help but be blown away by the exceptionally strong performance of the 850. It floats like a butterfly and stings like a… Polaris!

Thinking back, is there anything you would have changed about the Indy XC 129 last season?

AJ: Honestly, I can’t think of a single thing I don’t like about that sled! I like to think I’m pretty unbiased and there are truly very few sleds I can say this about, but the Indy XC is perfect the way it is and this is coming from a guy who had yellow underwear for a good part of my life due to my racing history.

ST: Is the 2020 137-inch version just a logical progression for the Indy, or is it the real deal – and better than the 129? How does it work in powder compared to other crossover sleds?

AJ: I think it is the logical progression from the 129. It has to be. However, with that said there is no reason it’s not still the real deal. While we knew right away a 137 would be next, it’s not just a “me too” sled. It’s every bit as good as the 129. In fact if you’re running a bit more fresh snow, say on lakes or riding over heavier snowpack, the 137 puts the power to the ground more effectively and reduces track spin. Keep in mind, with the 850 you could spin any length track pretty much at any time but the increased grip of 8-inches more track lets the Indy accelerate harder and grab better.

How would you rate the differences in ride compliance between the 137 XC and the 129?

AJ: If you’re a corner to corner, trail shredding, ditch banger then 129 will be your jam, but honestly for those of us who cruise wider, more open trails and are looking for a bit better big bump compliance with slightly less aggressive cornering ability, the 137 is a great choice. I feel the rear end ride is not incredibly different, but there’s better bump bridging and acceleration with the 137 and maybe a bit better cornering with the 129. That’s pretty much the big difference I see. Some of our testers here felt the 137 definitely rode better than the 129 but honestly, they’re both really close.

You’ve always been a big fan of Polaris’ handling. Did you feel like there was a handling penalty with the longer track?

AJ: There will always be slightly reduced steering precision when you increase track length and/or lug height. There has to be; it’s physics. However, with the much closer sized sleds of today at 129 and 137 as apposed to 10 years ago running 120 and 136’s, the differences are truly harder to feel and the handling penalty of a longer track is less obvious.

What track depth would you consider ideal for the 137? Would you keep the same track on the 600 as on the 850 or 800?

AJ: I’m a fan of the Ice Cobra at 1.352. It’s a great all-around track that lets you not only grip like crazy on hard packed or icy surfaces but also gives that little extra bit of lug to power through deeper snow should you encounter it. A 1.25 lug is fine for a 600, but I do find some reduced performance when you go with that heavier pre-studded track and deeper lug with the 600 rotating it. My choice would be 1.25 on the 600, and the Ice Cobra with the 800 and 850.

How different is the 850 compared to the 800 – really?

AJ: How different are apples and shoulder rockets! As far as I’m concerned, that isn’t even a comparison! The 850, man… this is the kinda engine your momma warned you about. The 800 is a great powerplant, and I still really enjoy it, but the 850 is a fire breathing dragon just waiting to destroy every snowflake in your path. Up top, down low and in the midrange it just flat-out outperforms the 800.

What do you think of the XC’s riding position, controls and instrumentation. Is there anything you’d change?

AJ: Riding position is excellent, comfortable and is long day, high-mile comfy while still allowing you to stand up and ride through really brutal, worn-out weekend moguls. The controls and instrumentation are detailed and right where you need them and work well with intuitive gauge interactions. I still can’t believe Polaris is the only manufacturer offering a GPS. Isn’t this 2020? Hands down, the best gauge ever and a worthwhile upgrade not just to fulfill some random tech craving (and, trust me, it’s a fun addition and comes in handy), but also exceptional for resale value!

Give us three gob-smacking positives that hit you and three negatives – no matter how big or small.

AJ:

POSITIVES:

1) Best engine in the business (Patriot 850).
2) Best front end suspension with most precise steering.
3) Incredibly well-thought-out design ranging from appearance, to rider comfort to under-hood accessibility.

NEGATIVES:

1) As a critic, this is the hardest sled in the business to find fault with.
2) The 850 is only Snow-Checkable, so in-season buyer = out of luck.
3) Having to disappoint your friends who thought “they” had the best sled.

THREE SEASONS IN ONE

0

It’s been a long haul for our readers who reside in the US Midwest. Before last winter’s near record cold and snowfall and thus a long riding season, there had been five so-so winters in a row for the US heartland.

In Canada, particularly in the province of Ontario, we’ve had some duds and some winners in the same time span. Before you assume that’s because we’re way up north and should expect lots of consistent snow, consider this: The heartland of snowmobiling on the east side of the Great Lakes in Ontario, New York and Quebec is mostly located parallel to or just south of prime riding areas in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. The Great Lakes send a lot of snow to us here in the east.

In terms of attitude and overall enthusiasm for snowmobiling, we’d have to rate this fall as strong. The response to early-order programs was, across the board, exceptional.

With the Midwest having a strong snow season last winter, motivation to early-order a new ride was so strong it set records. As history has shown, time and again after a good winter, particularly one that goes late into March and early April, the manufacturers are pretty much guaranteed a strong early-order sales season. That’s exactly what happened in virtually every market where snowmobiles are sold.

With the OEMs claiming they have varying degrees of unsold inventory for sale this fall it’s interesting to ponder what will happen next. “Next” is the in-season sales season. It’s the second segment of the three part snowmobile yearly sales cycle.

Once we get to mid-December “show me” buyers enter the market. This is the third part of the sales cycle. These buyers don’t care about last season’s snow but would rather patiently wait until they see how the current winter kicks-off.

Believe it or not, these buyers are, for the most part, western deep snow types. What’s really interesting about this phenomenon is this: The mountain market is now the largest single segment in the sport. This means the OEMs have to “ball park” mountain sled production numbers to a higher degree than the “trail” segments and can end up with crates of unsold sleds if winter begins late or is less than heroic out west.

Ski-Doo, for the first time in many years, has some non-current inventory it has been successfully selling this fall. It will be interesting to watch what effect this will have on 2020 model fall sales. Ski-Doo’s Spring Break early order program was a huge hit last spring.

Arctic Cat’s “build to order” posture has to be causing dealers heartache without access to any current model year sleds to sell this fall while Polaris looks to be pretty clean of non-currents and you can bet they built long on mountain models as demand for the RMK series is at a fever pitch out west.

Yamaha swallowed the bitter pill a year ago and built short in an effort to clean house and move non-currents out the door. From what we heard it’s done just that and is selling 2020 sleds without the distraction of unprofitable year-old models.

Inasmuch as the fall sales season for flatland sleds is pretty much guaranteed to be strong, the mountain market will ultimately have the final say as to whether model year 2020 is a success.

The good news for the OEMs is this: From a weather perspective the western marketplace is considerably less volatile than the eastern flatland market. In other words, it traditionally snows with more consistency out west than in the east.

If the western market responds to good early season snow, the sno-mo-biz should card an excellent year, despite Arctic Cat not playing in the same game for MY 2020.

Early season programs across the board were highly successful so model year 2020 is already off to a great start.

SNOWMOBILING TRENDS HAPPENING NOW

0

Snowmobiling is unprecedented in its introduction of ground-breaking technology and use of engineering ideas other powersports mediums only dream about applying.

What’s happening in the auto industry has a tangible effect on what’s going on with snowmobiles. Same with the electronics industry; it’s no accident we’re seeing increased digitization used in the instrument packages offered on snowmobiles, and even the availability of things like GPS and cell phone app compatibility.

There are bigger trends happening. BRP recently announced it is building prototype 100-percent electric versions of its Sea-Doo watercraft and Spyder street roadster.

In a recent post on mainstream media, the company made it clear it will be building prototype all-electric Ski-Doo snowmobiles in the near future potentially for use in ski-hill applications and probably, national parks.

This response is clearly driven by the auto industry’s drive to perfect and market electric cars and trucks. Whether you agree with the demise of fossil-fuel powered transportation or not, this line of thinking is being pushed big-time by pseudo-scientists and politicians. It’s a trend that exists and is being jammed down our throats in a big way.

Clean and green electric power is a trend we gasoline addicts cannot buck – and it’s just not wise if we bury our heads in the sand and ignore it.

Yes, we can produce all the arguments about how environmentally clean our sport has become in the past decade, but governments only interested in getting re-elected continue to try to sell us on the fact that all fossil-fuel powered vehicles are tremendously evil and we need to be going electric.

So far, we haven’t had a chance to actually try out an electric snowmobile. A company you’ll be hearing more about, Taiga, actually plans to build a couple thousand of them this year – and we’re betting they work surprisingly well.

Another completely different trend we’re seeing – and it’s exclusive to the snowmobile business – is increasing consumer demand for price-point sleds.

There’s an awareness among newbies interested in getting into the sport that it’s expensive. This is entirely true and is a pretty major roadblock in getting the boundaries of the snowmobile market to increase.

If the market has come to a place where only those who are seasoned, experienced enthusiasts are prospective buyers, then our marketplace is only going to get smaller.

So far, the OEMS have not wholeheartedly responded to this trending line of thinking, but they need to! We need sleds that are cheap, fun and offer the full snowmobile experience at an unprecedented low price.

Yes, there are a couple of sleds that do this – the baseline, and unchanged for years, 600 Indy and Ski-Doo XP Sport series sleds are examples – but both companies hide these sleds at the back of their product brochures and refuse to promote or glorify them lest they become too popular and outsell their pricier, more fully equipped models.

There are very inexpensive ways to offer these sleds with already-developed suspension and driveline technology that would tempt first-time buyers or those who have been out of the sport for a while, to invest.

You could argue the industry is already moving this direction with sleds like the EVO, SnoScoot and ZR200; however, it’s different. Those are snowmobiles designed for an already-entrenched market and are never sold into a vacuum – meaning there’s always someone else in the family with an adult-sized full-meal-deal sled.

There are choices to make and ideas to be followed-up as pressure from world-wide trends become more visible. I just hope they never bring out a self-driving sled. That would really suck!

Everything YouNeed To Know About Ski-Doo’s pDrive Clutch

0

Motorhead Mark Lester is in the SnowTrax TRAIL TECH shop giving an overview of Ski-Doo’s unique clutch system – pDrive.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!

2-STROKE OIL CONSUMPTION

0

If you’ve ever owned a Ski-Doo E-TEC you were likely really surprised at how little oil the engine was consuming over the course of a day or even a week’s riding.

I remember my first experience with a low-emissions 2-stroke the first time I rode it. I checked the oil tank and started to panic. “Surely, I’m going to ruin this engine. Something must be wrong with the oil pump – or an oil line must be blocked – because it just isn’t using enough oil at all.”

The fact is 2-stroke oil is a pretty amazing substance, sticks like glue to wear surfaces and mixes with gasoline very uniformly and rapidly.

In pre-mix situations you can go as high as 100 to one gas-to-oil ratio with some oils and not damage your engine. Seems almost ridiculous!

With Semi-Direct and Direct Injection engines there’s very little gasoline introduced into the crankcase – in some cases, none. As a matter of fact, an E-TEC engine’s crankcase is pretty much sealed-off from the engine’s combustion chambers when it’s running and there’s only fresh, clean air allowed by the throttle bodies into the bottom end which is immediately transferred via transfer ports to the top of the engine.

This is one of the reasons the engine uses so little oil: When there’s no gasoline washing down or diluting the oil going to the crankshaft and rod bearings every stroke, the lube stays on those bearings way longer.

With an E-TEC engine or a Polaris Cleanfire SDI, the oil is “pin-point” injected in minute proportions directly onto those bearing surfaces. Piston rings and wrist pin lube is also delivered by the oil pump.

The point is, very little oil is needed on those engine parts because gas isn’t mixing with the oil and washing it off the bearings and up the transfers. As a result you don’t use as much oil as the old days of carburetors and mechanical oil pumps.

Less oil consumption makes a great case for the newest electronic oil pump technology that links up with the sled’s ECU to determine how much oil is demanded by the engine at whatever particular RPM it’s running.

These new “smart” oil pumps are a big part of the reason the newest-gen 2-strokes can run so oil lean.

Ski-Doo’s Turbocharger on the 900 ACE Turbo Engine

0

Motorhead Mark Lester is in the SNOWTRAX TRAIL TECH shop delivering an overview of the ROTAX turbocharger on the 900 ACE Turbo engine.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!

DIRTY ROTTEN ENGINES: Cat’s Laydown 700 Twin

0

A number of the most popular, most beloved 2-stroke engines in snowmobile history were actually grossly inefficient and EPA dirty.

They simply had to go in an effort by the OEMs to clean up their total corporate average emissions. I call these engines “rotten” because that’s what they’re doing – rotting – in older sleds while the pricey tooling used to cast their myriad pieces literally rots away.

PART 5: Arctic Cat’s Laydown 700CC Suzuki Twin

This uniquely configured 2-stroke twin powering a legion of FireCats beginning in 2002 was one of the most mysterious motors ever introduced in this biz.

This weird engine, with the intake and exhaust on the same side, shouldn’t have run this fast. Engine gurus claimed the intake charge was actually shooting directly at the crank cheeks which were spinning the wrong way to aid induction.

We suspect the same thing that propelled the legendary Fuji 500 Polaris was at play with the Firecat. What, you ask? A highly refined drive system and chassis that was exceptionally friction free.

FireCat 600s (a variant of the 700) would regularly tow competitors’ 700s while the 700 FC could go past competitive sleds so fast down Kevlar Lake the vacuum in their wake would pull the hoods off all challengers.

Maybe we’ll never know the real reason behind this engine’s dominance; or, maybe, like one OEM told me – it wasn’t a 700 at all but rather a 750 and nobody ever bothered to measure the thing. Now rotting but never forgotten.

THERE’S MORE MUCH LOVED, DIRTY, ROTTEN ENGINES TO COME SO STAY TUNED!

DIRTY ROTTEN ENGINES: SRX 700cc Triple

0

A number of the most popular, most beloved 2-stroke engines in snowmobile history were actually grossly inefficient and EPA dirty.

They simply had to go in an effort by the OEMs to clean up their total corporate average emissions. I call these engines “rotten” because that’s what they’re doing – rotting – in older sleds while the pricey tooling used to cast their myriad pieces literally rots away.

PART 4: Yamaha’s SRX 700cc 2-stroke Triple

This nimble triple delivered top-end power that was nothing short of insanity when you pulled the trigger.

I think Yamaha got fed up with delivering less than industry-standard power output during the 90’s and someone on this side of the pond faxed Hamamatsu with instructions to build the baddest triple 2-stroke the sport had ever seen. This engine was a good answer to the industry question: “Do we really need a bigger engine than a 700?”

It used triple carbs, case reeds and triple pipes and introduced detonation-fighting knock sensor technology to the sport in the late 90’s that just dared the owner to lean the fuel mixture out.

Pretty clearly – in fact, undoubtedly – the SRX moniker experienced 100-percent redemption with the intro of this lake shredding, drag race dominating engine.

Committed Yama-fans still get tears in their eyes and bury their hands in their mitts when the topic of the 700 SRX triple comes up for discussion.

It was the last of a great run of high performance 2-strokes for Yamaha and we all know what happened to the 700 and every other 2-stroke in Yamaha’s repertoire soon after: The 4-stroke arrived in 2003 and the rest is history.